Innovations In Clinical Neuroscience

NOV-DEC 2017

A peer-reviewed, evidence-based journal for clinicians in the field of neuroscience

Issue link:

Contents of this Issue


Page 39 of 83

40 ICNS INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE November-December 2017 • Volume 14 • Number 11–12 O R I G I N A L R E S E A R C H job obtainment and work outcome in individuals with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2017 Jun 7. 14. Strauss GP, Horan WP, Kirkpatrick B, et al. Deconstructing negative symptoms of schizophrenia: avolition-apathy and diminished expression clusters predict clinical presentation and functional outcome. J Psychiatry Res. 2013;47(6):783–790. 15. Jang SK, Choi HI, Park S, et al. A two-factor model better explains heterogeneity in negative symptoms: evidence from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Front Psychol. 2016;7:707. 16. Castro SM, Curi M, Torman VB, Riboldi J. Differential item functioning in the Beck depression inventory. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2001;18(1):54–67. 17. Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1974;13(2):261– 276. 18. Khan A, Yarovsky Y, Liechti S, et al. A rasch model to test the cross-cultural validity in the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) across six geo-cultural groups. BMC Psychol. 2013;1(1):5. 19. Daniel DG, Alphs L, Cazorla P, et al. Training for assessment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia across languages and cultures: comparison of the NSA-16 with the PANSS Negative Subscale and Negative Symptom factor. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2011;5(2):87–94. 20. Brekke JS, Barrio C. Cross-ethnic symptom differences in schizophrenia: the influence of culture and minority status. Schizophr Bull. 1997;23(2):305–316. 21. Foussias G, Remington G. Negative symptoms in schizophrenia: avolition and Occam's razor. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36(2):359–369. 22. Zumbo BD. A Handbook on the Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF): Logistic Regression Modeling as a Unitary Framework for Binary and Likert-type (ordinal) Item Scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense; 1999. 23. Goren E. Economic Effects of Domestic and Neighbouring Countries' Cultural Diversity. Working Papers V-352-13. Oldenburg, Germany: University of Oldenburg Department of Economics; 2013. Retrieved from ETSG2013/Papers/042.pdf. 24. Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31–36. 25. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis, a Global Perspective. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2010. 26. Forza C, Filippini R. TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: A causal model. Int J Prod Econ. 1998;55(1):1–20. 27. Awang Z. Structural Equation Modeling Using Amos Graphic. Malaysia: UiTM Press; 2012. 28. IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. 29. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2013. 30. Kim SH, Cohen AS, Alagoz, C, Kim S. DIF detection and effect size measures for polytomous scored items. J Edu Meas. 2007;44(2):93–116. 31. Gelin MN, Zumbo BD. Differential item functioning results may change depending on how an item is scored: An illustration with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Edu Psychol Meas. 2003;63(1):65–74. 32. Monahan PO, McHorney CA, Stump TE, Perkins AJ. Odds ratio, delta, ETS classification, and standardization measures of DIF magnitude for binary logistic regression. J Edu Behav Stat. 2007;32(1):92–109. 33. Angoff WH. Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. In: Holland PW, Wainer H, eds. Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1993: 3–23. 34. Longford NT, Holland PW, Thayer DT. Stability of the MH D-DIF statistics across populations. In: Holland PW, Wainer H, eds. Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1993: 171–196. 35. Yavorsky C, Liechti S, Opler M. The impact of language and culture on the delivery of standardized rater training for the PANSS across seven countries. Eur Psychiatry. 2010;25(1):1555. 36. Mesquita B, Frijda NH. Cultural variations in emotions: a review. Psychol Bull. 1992:112(2):179–204. 37. Engelmann JB, Pogosyan M. Emotion perception across cultures: the role of cognitive mechanisms. Front Psychol. 2013;4:118. 38. McCrae RR, Costa PT, Ostendorf F, et al. Nature over nurture: temperament, personality, and lifespan development. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;78(1):173– 186. 39. Adolphs R, Jansari A, Tranel D. Hemispheric perception of emotional valence from facial expressions. Neuropsychol. 2001;15(4):516–524. 40. Elfenbein HA, Ambady N. Cultural similarity's consequences: A distance perspective on cross- cultural differences in emotion recognition. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2003;34(1):92–110. 41. Markus HR, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev. 1991;98(2):224–253. 42. Heine SJ, Lehman DR, Markus HR, Kitayama S. Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychol Rev. 1999;106(4):766–794. 43. Matsumoto D, Yoo SH, Fontaine J. Mapping expressive differences around the world: the relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Jo Cross-Cult Psychol. 2008;39(1):55–74. 44. Robertson BR, Prestia D, Twamley EW, et al. Social competence versus negative symptoms as predictors of real world social functioning in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2014;160(1- 3):136–141. 45. van Herk H, Poortinga YH, Verhallen TM. Response styles in rating scales: Evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2004;35(3):346–360. 46. Harvey PD, Khan A, Keefe RSE. Using the PANSS to define different domains of negative symptoms: prediction of everyday functioning by impairments in emotional expression and emotional experience. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2017;14(11-12):18–22. 47. Zieky M. DIF statistics in test development. In: Holland PW, Wainer H, eds. Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1993: 337- 347. 48. Linacre JM. WINSTEPS, Version 3.81. Chicago, IL: Winsteps; 2014. 49. Camilli G, Shepard LA. Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1994. 50. Clauser BE, Mazor KM. Using statistical procedures to identify differentially functioning test items. Educ Meas. 1998;17(1):31–44. 51. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22(4):719–748. 52. Holland PW, Thayer DT. Differential item functioning and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In: Wainer H, Braun HI, eds. Test Validity. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988: 129–145. 53. Holland PW, Thayer DT. An alternate definition of the ETS delta scale of item difficulty (ETS Program Statistics Research Technical Report No. 85-64). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service; 1985. ICNS

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Innovations In Clinical Neuroscience - NOV-DEC 2017